I’m No Dhimmi
This web
site is a project that I have decided to undertake after thinking long and hard
about the effects and after effects of the 9/11 terrorist strikes.
The site’s
title sheds some light on my purpose, and that being my absolute unwavering
solidarity with TRADITIONAL WESTERN IDEALS such as Freedom of the Individual,
Democracy, Human rights, Fairness of Law, TOLERANCE, Freedom of AND FROM
imposed religion.
With that
statement some may conclude that I am some unhinged leftie moon-bat. Nothing
could be further from the truth as my approach to life could be best described
as Conservative/libertarian/Free Market/un-professed religion (relatively
sympathetic to generic MODERATE Christianity). This puts me in some rather
large conspicuous profiling groups.
An
important thing to remember is that I do not advocate violence against peaceful
people whether they are Muslims or non-Muslims in the west or otherwise. The
point of the site is to draw attention to the emerging trend of violence
against especially non-Muslims in the world. Being careful not to denigrate a
“people” is fine but it no excuse to prevent a frank and open discussion
regarding what appears is an evident all out war declared against us.
From a
very respected person , Robert Spencer's web site [
http://www.jihadwatch.com ] outlines the real problem in a nutshell:
In fact, as I have pointed
out here hundreds of times, the stated goal of Muhammad the prophet of Islam,
and the various schools of Islamic jurisprudence, is not to "kill us, the
'infidels,'" but to extend the hegemony of Islamic law over the world.
Muhammad told his followers to offer "polytheists" conversion,
subjugation as dhimmis, or war, and Qur'an 9:29 makes
it clear that that offer is to be extended to Jews and Christians. Cherry-picking violent texts? Alas, no: the imperative that
the Islamic umma must wage war against non-Muslims
until they either convert or submit is taught by all the schools of Islamic
jurisprudence, and reinforced by the near-unanimous example of Islamic history.
Contemporary jihadists invoke these texts to justify
their actions and make recruits among Muslims, as I show in my book "The
Truth About Muhammad".
This is a global problem, few are facing up to it, and CAIR et al are
skillfully using charges of "bigotry" against those who point out the
Islamic teachings that are justifying violence and need to be addressed by
Islamic reformers if they are sincere about reform. But to characterize the
situation as Muslims wanting to "kill us, the 'infidels'" is an
inaccurate and inflammatory reductionism that only makes the speaker sound like
a crank, instead of sounding the alarm in any effective way…. There are aspects
of Islam that are hateful and frightening indeed, and aspects that aren't.
There are Muslims who are hateful and frightening, and Muslims who aren't. It
is much better, I believe, to focus on the aspects
that are hateful and frightening and oppose them on the grounds of human
rights, human decency, Judeo-Christian values. Characterizing the religion as a
whole as hateful and frightening just made it easier for CAIR to pounce….
Let’s set
the record straight off the bat. This site is about unearthing some real truth
as to why we in the west are being victimized by those who profess to be “Pure
Muslims”. Islam is not a race, is not a recognized sexual orientation, and as
such has no special protections accorded it even from the oft questionable
ACLU. Below is a paste from their site describing what their version of Hate
Speech is. If it doesn’t fall into this description it must not be such. Asking
questions about someone’s belief system or ideology - be it religious or
political - is not nor should it be considered so. If that were the case we’d
have to lock up most or all of the politicians, civil rights advocates, and
religious leaders and their followers- in general anyone who has questioned
authority and the status quo.
|
|
|
|
Hate Speech
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S.
-Oxford English Dictionary Online, s.v.
"hate"
|
In the
following paragraph it might be best to use a very weighty and valuable
argument for contemplation:
“If there is any principle of the Constitution that
more imperatively calls for attachment than any other, it is the principle of
free thought- not free thought for those who agree with us but freedom for the
thought that we hate.”
Justice Oliver
Wendell Holmes Jr. in United
States v. Schwimmer (1929)
Of
tolerance, I have my convictions and I completely tolerate other’s rights to
believe as they choose with proviso that it is not hateful toward other groups
and incites violence in the same vein. This however does not mean that I am not
prejudiced (good meaning of the word) in favor of my own opinion- having
thought the subject through and arriving at my own conclusions. When I believe
whatever it is I believe, if it does not conform to YOUR idea of right and
wrong, my holding firm to my opinion with or without data you consider to be
more correct, does not give you the right to call me intolerant. This is
increasingly the case with a rather large segment of society most noticeably
displayed by modern “Leftist” or “Secular Progressive” thinking and actions.
Often this verbiage and vitriol against especially the “right” is completely
over the top, irrational and often presents itself as delusional. This is a
practice developed and perfected by the Communists during the Cold war and
picked up by the “New Left” for instance. A more insidious group- if that can
be imagined – is that of the media mouthpieces of the Middle Eastern Muslim
community, who take their cues from the propaganda machinations of
Nazi-Germany. In fact there is quite the link between upsurges in terrorism (or
more specifically Islamist Supremacy) from that Muslim community and Nazi Germany. A lot
of their cartoon editorials, slogans, and methodologies are directly stolen
from that era and are indeed “hate speech” from a victim’s point of view. In
fact it most often is a call to obligatory duty to Islam in that they are
espousing violence and death to everyone from America to Jewry to our political
systems –because it conflicts with their stated goals of world domination.
Although I
do not agree much - if at all –with Leftists or Secular Progressives (SP’s), I
do believe that we in the west (those of us that adhere to democratic
principles at least) must amend our vehement attacks on each other and join
forces to put the stops on the increasingly powerful archenemy Islamist
Fascism. The major question is: if the moderate Muslims the world over do not
begin to differentiate themselves substantially from the “terrorists”, how can
we non-Muslims know the difference and consequently can we then include all
Muslims in the same category for they themselves have actively chosen to forego
distinction by their inactions? After all, we are not allowed to discriminate
(negative meaning of the word) in this world of political correctness! Forever,
the freedom loving West has been the archenemy of Socialists/Communists/Totalitarianists
and Despots the world over. As a political/economic/social system, what is
known as the “West” is a relatively new kid on the block compared to Radical
Islam, especially in the separation of Church and State. Another question is:
Is there a difference between Islam and radical Islam? The Muslim community
must be able to differentiate it amongst themselves, and it would be fantastic
if they could let us all in on the meaning. Radical Islam does not like us, our
attitudes, our way of life, our political system…in fact they just hate us and
everything about us. It is their stated desire to wipe us off the face of the
earth or have us all converted to obedient Muslims under their freshly
installed Theocracies.
Although I
do not consider myself a zealot in any particular direction, I am steadfast in
my conviction of adherence to traditional Western ideals. This puts me at
direct odds with the teachings and practices of Islam, of which I personally
find more and more abhorrent the deeper I investigate. This in and of itself
would not constitute a worthy mention at all if some of – and an ever
increasing number of - the followers of the “Religion of Peace” (after they
kill, conquer, or force you to submit to them) were not so “Hell-bent” on total
world domination. This by default means that I am at war with those whom have
declared war on the West- and by default YOU and ME!
On this
site you will not find a great deal of Political Correctness, for I have
concluded after considerable contemplation that Political Correctness is a
major tool for the enemy. What we do need however is open, honest discussion of
the actions of Muslims worldwide as the “Jihad” continues their “Crusade” to
rid the world of Infidels or Non-Believers. The spoken words of their leaders
have to be understood in their context and taken for the truth after
consideration of what audience was being spoken to. Quite often the home
audience gets a very different version than the foreign one, although that is
not always the case.
A DHIMMI
in terms so a Westerner would understand is a person, persons or societies whom
have been (and consider themselves to be) subjugated under the Islamic
Jackboot. They must pay a “jizya” which is described by the Qur’an as
“poor-due”, but in reality is what amounts to “protection money” or a bribe in
order to not be put to death by the “Believers” (Muslims). They must consider
themselves subdued (second class or lower to Muslims). The proof is in the
Surah:
“[9:29] You shall fight back against those who do not believe in GOD, nor
in the Last Day, nor do they prohibit what GOD and His messenger have
prohibited, nor do they abide by the religion of truth (Islam) - among those
who received the scripture - until they pay the due tax, willingly or
unwillingly. “
It is my
goal to inform as many Westerners as possible of the Islamic Revolution beset
upon them by these Radical Islamists. I
shall question the motives and actions of ALL MUSLIMS until such time as the
“moderate” Muslim community sequester themselves from their “extremist”
brethren by word and deed to admonish, refute, denounce, and take action
against those that wish us all harm- including themselves- or subjugation to a
state inflicted religion. Until that time it would be prudent for non-Muslims
to hold no differentiation of a “good Muslim or a bad Muslim”, as there is only
one Qur’an (the source of all this hatred against all non-Muslims), and that is
apparently not subject to revision as it was the word of “God”. This is
apparently different from Christianity and its reformation and metamorphosis
from its early days. In some way, shape or form the Muslims in the West must
pick sides. They are either with us and our Constitution and our value system
or it is with their religion. There can be no middle ground nor negotiating as
either side is the antithesis of and incompatible with each other. Oil and
water do not mix except by emulsion and that takes an enormous amount of
continuous energy to achieve and sustain. I have my doubts that this is an
effective way to live. Islam is the perfect “Diametrical Western Ideal”
religion. Those Muslims living in the West must understand that the eventual
goal of Islamic domination and elimination of Western society replaced by a
rigid, absolutist Muslim Nazi-like Theocracy as evidenced by for example Iran, is an act
of insurrection against the peaceful peoples of the societies in which they
live. As an example of this, it is their stated goal to replace the
Constitution of the United
States of America with Sharia Law as written
in the Qur’an. For your information Sharia Law is described as:
“The
code of law derived from the Koran and from the teachings and example of
Mohammed; "Sharia is only applicable to Muslims"; "under Islamic
law there is no separation of church and state"
To most
westerners who are ignorant of what the Qur’an is; it is the “Bible” of Islam.
Reading it however, would in all likelihood leave a typical free thinking
Westerner with chills up their spine by it’s absolute brutishness, archaic
thinking, hateful and spiteful commandments. The examples of behaviours
documented in the Qur’an perpetrated by “Mohammed the Prophet” display some of
the absolute worst qualities of humankind: spitefulness, resentment, jealousy,
greed, hatred, murder…The Qur’an in my personal opinion is a diatribe in
Hate-Speech in itself as some of the files contained here-in (along with direct
quotations from the Qur’an- albeit translated from it’s native language) shall
reveal. Keep in mind that there are some minor variations in wording of each
passage but the meaning is the same. At the same time these Radical Islamists
use this same Qur’an and its passages to justify their actions of Jihad against
us. Moreover the often heard claim that Islam is the “Religion of Peace” seems
to be counterintuitive to the actions of those strictly adhering to the Qur’an.
If these are the “Pure Muslims”, then what are the “Impure” ones?
If you are
a Christian and used to the notion of “love thy enemy as thyself” and other
teachings and actions of Jesus Christ being the ultimate passivist, then a
reading of the Qur’an will open your eyes as to what passes for “the word of
God” in Islam. If it were that God was as malicious and spiteful as
demonstrated by Mohammed the Prophet, then there are some serious discrepancies
as to which God we are talking about –they cannot be referencing the same one.
The Christian God is portrayed as one of benevolence, tolerance, charity;
completely the opposite of the Islamic God.
In Western
Society (or at least in the United States of America I have the right to make
such statements without reprisal as this cannot be considered “Hate-Speech”,
yet two things may strike you as shocking:
1. I
should be persecuted and condemned to death by the hands of the Muslim faithful
by “virtue” of the Qur’an for blaspheming anything Muslim.
2. Muslims
demand to be immune and protected from any and all criticism, yet inflict
infinitely more of their own upon all others (non-Believers).
3. As I
can make this statement being in a free country, I cannot do so without penalty
of death in a Muslim country. The state itself becomes the religious enforcer
and all must adhere to the teachings of the Qur’an. No dissent is welcome,
possible or TOLERATED. This sounds exactly like the vast majority of
totalitarian regimes we have come to know.
If this is
your vision for your life and your children and grandchildren as a Westerner,
then Islam is for you! If not, better get out your fighting words and resist
all advances against your society.
I have yet
to put links to the files that are contained here, and they are increasing
regularly, however I shall endeavor to do so promptly and
I decided
to do some research and on this site, as with so much of what I find on the
Internet, is where I shall attempt to collect, organize the information that I
have discovered. I am currently just collecting and I am not an expert on
creating and maintaining web sites or anything, so feel free to browse the
files contained herein and if you have questions, clarifications or suggestions
(as opposed to abuse or spam) please email me at
admin@imnodhimmi.com
By all
means if you are a moderate Muslim speak up so I can get your point of view and
frame of reference. I do promise to respectful of your opinions if you afford
me the same courtesy. I will in fact change anything on this site if it can be
proven/disproved/verified/clarified.
Please
consider that I have already come to some conclusions as based on my witness
and investigation and will work it through to find a more valid explanation if
one exists. That is fair. That is what I promise.
The best
question I have formulated so far is to ask of Islam:
What will
it take for Islam to be worthy of the distinction “the religion of peace”?
click
here and follow each link
other links:
I am John Doe